<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC publishes insult via Twitter. Or does it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/</link>
	<description>A technology-media-music party for your brain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitter goldrush on the way. Old usernames to be released</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-49884</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter goldrush on the way. Old usernames to be released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-49884</guid>
		<description>[...] own a trademark relating to the name. Back on my old blog 14sandwiches I covered the story of how the BBC got control of the @BBCNews name from someone who misused [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] own a trademark relating to the name. Back on my old blog 14sandwiches I covered the story of how the BBC got control of the @BBCNews name from someone who misused [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter goldrush on the way. Old usernames to be released</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-49883</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter goldrush on the way. Old usernames to be released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-49883</guid>
		<description>[...] own a trademark relating to the name. Back on my old blog 14sandwiches I covered the story of how the BBC got control of the @BBCNews name from someone who misused it.Besides that the only way to get Twitter to give you a username is if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] own a trademark relating to the name. Back on my old blog 14sandwiches I covered the story of how the BBC got control of the @BBCNews name from someone who misused it.Besides that the only way to get Twitter to give you a username is if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MartinSFP</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>MartinSFP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>Were you the previous operator of the &#039;BBC&#039; Twitter account?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The BBC has quite a few Twitter accounts for various purposes - they just hadn&#039;t thought to register &#039;BBC&#039;. As &#039;BBC&#039; is a trademark they&#039;d be very likely to win it in a court of law. Twitter recognised that and handed it to the rightful owner. Consider how much harm could have been caused if that fake account had been used for more than mildly insulting one person. As Tom states above, there are all sorts of risks. It&#039;s only right that Twitter gave it to the BBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you the previous operator of the &#39;BBC&#39; Twitter account?</p>
<p>The BBC has quite a few Twitter accounts for various purposes &#8211; they just hadn&#39;t thought to register &#39;BBC&#39;. As &#39;BBC&#39; is a trademark they&#39;d be very likely to win it in a court of law. Twitter recognised that and handed it to the rightful owner. Consider how much harm could have been caused if that fake account had been used for more than mildly insulting one person. As Tom states above, there are all sorts of risks. It&#39;s only right that Twitter gave it to the BBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MartinSFP</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4606</link>
		<dc:creator>MartinSFP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-4606</guid>
		<description>Everyone has the right to disagree with the BBC and to express their opinion. He&#039;s apologising over the mix-up of them not being in control of the &#039;BBC&#039; account on Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has the right to disagree with the BBC and to express their opinion. He&#39;s apologising over the mix-up of them not being in control of the &#39;BBC&#39; account on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4595</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-4595</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget, it all started because he was calling the BBC a disgrace; why apologise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t forget, it all started because he was calling the BBC a disgrace; why apologise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>Screw Twitter. They stole that account.......terms of services state cannot impersonate other twitter users doesn&#039;t it? BBC wasn&#039;t a user....they were still int he dark ages and still would be if it weren&#039;t for that account!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw Twitter. They stole that account&#8230;&#8230;.terms of services state cannot impersonate other twitter users doesn&#39;t it? BBC wasn&#39;t a user&#8230;.they were still int he dark ages and still would be if it weren&#39;t for that account!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4520</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-4520</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Jem - well handled by Twitter and the BBC...&lt;br&gt;There are lessons to be learnt here by any brand. &lt;br&gt;Twitter squatting is the new domain squatting.&lt;br&gt;We got some of the screenshots you mentioned and blogged the story here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://is.gd/hHvq&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://is.gd/hHvq&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Jem &#8211; well handled by Twitter and the BBC&#8230;<br />There are lessons to be learnt here by any brand. <br />Twitter squatting is the new domain squatting.<br />We got some of the screenshots you mentioned and blogged the story here:<br /><a href="http://is.gd/hHvq" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/hHvq</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBC Takes Back Control of Rogue Twitter Account (Lessons for Brands) &#124; native</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4515</link>
		<dc:creator>BBC Takes Back Control of Rogue Twitter Account (Lessons for Brands) &#124; native</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-4515</guid>
		<description>[...] today Twitter Inc handed the account to the real BBC, after a BBC staff member complained to Twitter Inc. It&#8217;s been cleared of all previous tweets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today Twitter Inc handed the account to the real BBC, after a BBC staff member complained to Twitter Inc. It&#8217;s been cleared of all previous tweets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jem Stone</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>Jem Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>Further update. We&#039;ve now taken back ownership of &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/bbc/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/bbc/&lt;/a&gt; at the BBC. At the moment we will just use it temporarily to direct users to the growing list of BBC DJs, presenters, journalists and programmes using twitter in all sorts of ways.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks again for highlighting this issue. btw: the original account has been deleted by Twitter.&lt;br&gt;so a few of the links above will now no longer work. Hope you took screenshots!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And thanks for the other advice about phishing and so on from other users.  All appreciated.&lt;br&gt;Twitter responded to this promptly within a matter of hours btw. I&#039;m going to DM Gary to apologise on behalf of the Beeb.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jem Stone &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/jemstone/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/jemstone/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further update. We&#39;ve now taken back ownership of <a href="http://twitter.com/bbc/" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/bbc/</a> at the BBC. At the moment we will just use it temporarily to direct users to the growing list of BBC DJs, presenters, journalists and programmes using twitter in all sorts of ways.</p>
<p>thanks again for highlighting this issue. btw: the original account has been deleted by Twitter.<br />so a few of the links above will now no longer work. Hope you took screenshots!</p>
<p>And thanks for the other advice about phishing and so on from other users.  All appreciated.<br />Twitter responded to this promptly within a matter of hours btw. I&#39;m going to DM Gary to apologise on behalf of the Beeb.</p>
<p>Jem Stone | <a href="http://twitter.com/jemstone/" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/jemstone/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://14sandwiches.com/2009/01/26/bbc-publishes-insult-via-twitter-or-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14sandwiches.com/?p=546#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>Has the BBC been through every single tweet that came from this account to ensure that none of them have contained false financial information, links to phishing sites or any other content that didn&#039;t come directly from the BBC newsfeed? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If not, you should - quickly! &lt;br&gt;If everything&#039;s ok, you&#039;re very, very lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the BBC been through every single tweet that came from this account to ensure that none of them have contained false financial information, links to phishing sites or any other content that didn&#39;t come directly from the BBC newsfeed? </p>
<p>If not, you should &#8211; quickly! <br />If everything&#39;s ok, you&#39;re very, very lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
